TokenAssemble

Runtime comparison

llama.cpp vs MLX LM

llama.cpp is a MIT-licensed runtime for Linux · macOS · Windows running on CUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCm; MLX LM is MIT-licensed for macOS on Metal. MLX LM rates easier to set up (4/5 vs 3/5 in our sourced ratings). Pick llama.cpp for serving many requests at once; pick MLX LM for maximum control over how the model runs.

Specllama.cppMLX LM
LicenseMITMIT
Operating systemsLinux · macOS · WindowsmacOS
GPU backendsCUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCmMetal
Installsource / binarypip
Ease of use3/54/5
Quant formatsggufmlx
Engineggmlmlx
GitHub stars119,7486,236
Latest versionb9935v0.31.3
Graphical app (GUI)NoNo
Server modeYesYes
OpenAI-compatible APIYesYes
CPU offloadYesNo
Multi-GPUYesNo
Speculative decodingYesNo
LoRA supportYesYes
KV-cache quantizationYesYes

Which should you use?

llama.cpp

Best for serving many requests at once. Command line and server, runs on CUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCm.

Full llama.cpp guide →

MLX LM

Best for maximum control over how the model runs. Command line and server, runs on Metal.

Full MLX LM guide →

Neither runtime changes whether a model fits — that is your memory and quantization. Check your hardware first, then pick the runtime.

Sources: llama.cpp github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp (as of 2026-07-11); MLX LM github.com/ml-explore/mlx-lm (as of 2026-07-08).