TokenAssemble

Runtime comparison

llama.cpp vs Text Generation WebUI

llama.cpp is a MIT-licensed runtime for Linux · macOS · Windows running on CUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCm; Text Generation WebUI is AGPL-3.0-licensed for Linux · macOS · Windows on CUDA · Metal · CPU · ROCm. Both rate 3/5 for ease of setup. Pick llama.cpp for serving many requests at once; pick Text Generation WebUI for people who want a desktop app and no terminal.

Specllama.cppText Generation WebUI
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
Operating systemsLinux · macOS · WindowsLinux · macOS · Windows
GPU backendsCUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCmCUDA · Metal · CPU · ROCm
Installsource / binarysource / binary
Ease of use3/53/5
Quant formatsgguf
Engineggmlllama.cpp|exllamav2|transformers
GitHub stars119,74847,437
Latest versionb9935v4.9
Graphical app (GUI)NoYes
Server modeYesYes
OpenAI-compatible APIYesYes
CPU offloadYesYes
Multi-GPUYesYes
Speculative decodingYesYes
LoRA supportYesYes
KV-cache quantizationYesYes

Which should you use?

llama.cpp

Best for serving many requests at once. Command line and server, runs on CUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCm.

Full llama.cpp guide →

Text Generation WebUI

Best for people who want a desktop app and no terminal. Ships a graphical app, installs in one line, runs on CUDA · Metal · CPU · ROCm.

Full Text Generation WebUI guide →

Neither runtime changes whether a model fits — that is your memory and quantization. Check your hardware first, then pick the runtime.

Sources: llama.cpp github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp (as of 2026-07-11); Text Generation WebUI github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui (as of 2026-07-08).