TokenAssemble

Runtime comparison

llama.cpp vs vLLM

llama.cpp is a MIT-licensed runtime for Linux · macOS · Windows running on CUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCm; vLLM is Apache-2.0-licensed for Linux on CUDA · ROCm. llama.cpp rates easier to set up (3/5 vs 2/5 in our sourced ratings). Pick llama.cpp for serving many requests at once; pick vLLM for serving many requests at once.

Specllama.cppvLLM
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Operating systemsLinux · macOS · WindowsLinux
GPU backendsCUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCmCUDA · ROCm
Installsource / binarypip / source
Ease of use3/52/5
Quant formatsggufawq, gptq
Engineggmlvllm
GitHub stars119,74885,770
Latest versionb9935v0.24.0
Graphical app (GUI)NoNo
Server modeYesYes
OpenAI-compatible APIYesYes
CPU offloadYesNo
Multi-GPUYesYes
Speculative decodingYesYes
LoRA supportYesYes
KV-cache quantizationYesYes

Which should you use?

llama.cpp

Best for serving many requests at once. Command line and server, runs on CUDA · Metal · CPU · Vulkan · ROCm.

Full llama.cpp guide →

vLLM

Best for serving many requests at once. Command line and server, runs on CUDA · ROCm.

Full vLLM guide →

Neither runtime changes whether a model fits — that is your memory and quantization. Check your hardware first, then pick the runtime.

Sources: llama.cpp github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp (as of 2026-07-11); vLLM github.com/vllm-project/vllm (as of 2026-07-08).