TokenAssemble

Runtime comparison

MLX LM vs Text Generation WebUI

MLX LM is a MIT-licensed runtime for macOS running on Metal; Text Generation WebUI is AGPL-3.0-licensed for Linux · macOS · Windows on CUDA · Metal · CPU · ROCm. MLX LM rates easier to set up (4/5 vs 3/5 in our sourced ratings). Pick MLX LM for maximum control over how the model runs; pick Text Generation WebUI for people who want a desktop app and no terminal.

SpecMLX LMText Generation WebUI
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
Operating systemsmacOSLinux · macOS · Windows
GPU backendsMetalCUDA · Metal · CPU · ROCm
Installpipsource / binary
Ease of use4/53/5
Quant formatsmlx
Enginemlxllama.cpp|exllamav2|transformers
GitHub stars6,23647,437
Latest versionv0.31.3v4.9
Graphical app (GUI)NoYes
Server modeYesYes
OpenAI-compatible APIYesYes
CPU offloadNoYes
Multi-GPUNoYes
Speculative decodingNoYes
LoRA supportYesYes
KV-cache quantizationYesYes

Which should you use?

MLX LM

Best for maximum control over how the model runs. Command line and server, runs on Metal.

Full MLX LM guide →

Text Generation WebUI

Best for people who want a desktop app and no terminal. Ships a graphical app, installs in one line, runs on CUDA · Metal · CPU · ROCm.

Full Text Generation WebUI guide →

Neither runtime changes whether a model fits — that is your memory and quantization. Check your hardware first, then pick the runtime.

Sources: MLX LM github.com/ml-explore/mlx-lm (as of 2026-07-08); Text Generation WebUI github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui (as of 2026-07-08).